Summary
The developer's lawyer, Steve Blaine, argued Paul Reeder lacks standing and appealed too late; the city disagreed, calling Reeder an aggrieved adjacent property owner. The Board's counsel confirmed the appeal concerns only the factual boundary determination.
At a glance
- Total mentions
- 1
- Last 30 days
- 0
Last discussed Mar 19, 2026.
Impact analysis
Local taxpayers could end up footing the bill for legal fees and any potential settlement or damages awarded in the lawsuit.
A standing finding keeps the appeal alive for the adjacent property owner.
Local taxpayers could take a financial hit if the city loses the lawsuit or spends heavily just to fight it.
Mentions & discussions (2)
Board of Zoning Appeals - Mar 19, 2026
The developer's lawyer, Steve Blaine, argued Paul Reeder lacks standing and appealed too late; the city disagreed, calling Reeder an aggrieved adjacent property owner. The Board's counsel confirmed the appeal concerns only the factual boundary determination.
Former Charlottesville police chief files lawsuit against city
Former Charlottesville police chief files lawsuit against city WSET
We'll email you when it's on an upcoming agenda and when it's voted on, at most once a day.
The weekly brief for Charlottesville
What the council decided, in plain English — one email a week.
Free. Unsubscribe with one click any time. We never sell your email.